文獻蒐集 (Bibliography)

**1999年之前的重要文獻也可參閱James Mallet所整理的Over 650 references on mimicry 

**上方"文獻蒐集"可依年份瀏覽，或可用"ctrl+F"搜尋文章


2018
  • Fujisawa M, Sakai Y &Kuwamura T. 2018. Aggressive mimicry of the cleaner wrasse by Aspidontus taeniatus functions mainly for small blennies. Ethology 124: 432–439.
  • Komata S, Lin CP & Sota T. 2018. Do juvenile developmental and adult body characteristics differ among genotypes at the doublesex locus that controls female-limited Batesian mimicry polymorphism in Papilio memnon?: A test for the ‘cost of mimicry’ hypothesis. Journal of Insect Physiology 107: 1–6
  • Motyka M, Kampova L & Bocak L. 2018. Phylogeny and evolution of Müllerian mimicry in aposematic Dilophotes: evidence for advergence and size-constraints in evolution of mimetic sexual dimorphism. Scientific Reports 8: 3744
  • Perger R & Rubio GD. 2018. A wolf in sheep’s clothing: The description of a fly resembling jumping spider of the genus Scoturius Simon, 1901 (Araneae: Salticidae: Huriini). PLOS ONE 13: e0190582
  • Rönkä K, DePasqual C, Mappes J, Gordon S & Rojas B. 2018. Colour alone matters: no predator generalization among morphs of an aposematic moth. Animal Behaviour 135: 153–163
  • Rönkä, K., Mappes, J., Kiviö, R., Salokannas, J., Michalis, C. & Rojas, B. 2018. Can multiple-model mimicry explain warning signal polymorphism in the wood tiger moth, Arctia plantaginis (Lepidoptera: Erebidae)? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Accepted.
  • Volponi MAS, McLean DJ, Volponi P & Dudley R. 2018. Moving like a model: mimicry of hymenopteran flight trajectories by clearwing moths of Southeast Asian rainforests. Biology Letters 14: 20180152.
  • Wilson JS, Pan AD, Limb ES & Williams KA. 2018. Comparison of African and North American velvet ant mimicry complexes: Another example of Africa as the ‘odd man out’. PLOS ONE 13: e0189482
  • Winters AE, Wilson NG, van den Berg CP, How MJ, Endler JA, Marshall NJ, White AM, Garson MJ & Cheney KL. 2018. Toxicity and taste: unequal chemical defences in a mimicry ring. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285: 20180457.


 2017
  • Akcali CK & Pfennig DW. 2017. Geographic variation in mimetic precision among different species of coral snake mimics. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 30: 1420–1428
  • Aubier TG, Elias M, Llaurens V & Chazot N. 2017. Mutualistic mimicry enhances species diversification through spatial segregation and extension of the ecological niche space. Evolution: 1–45
  • Attard MRG, Medina I, Langmore NE & Sherratt E. 2017. Egg shape mimicry in parasitic cuckoos. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 30: 2079–2084
  • Barnett JB, Cuthill IC & Scott-Samuel NE. 2017. Distance-dependent pattern blending can camouflage salient aposematic signals. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284: 20170128
  • Deshmukh R, Baral S, Gandhimathi A, Kuwalekar M & Kunte K. 2017. Mimicry in butterflies: co-option and a bag of magnificent developmental genetic tricks. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology 7: e291
  • Finkbeiner SD, Briscoe AD & Mullen SP. 2017. Complex dynamics underlie the evolution of imperfect wing pattern convergence in butterflies. Evolution: 1–11.
  • Jamie GA. 2017. Signals, cues and the nature of mimicry. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284: 20162080
  • Komata S, Lin CP & Sota T. 2017. Temporal dynamics of the mimetic allele frequency at the doublesex locus, which controls polymorphic Batesian mimicry in Papilio memnon butterflies. Scientific Reports 7: 12926. [blog]
  • Kret ME & DeDreu CKW. 2017. Pupil-mimicry conditions trust in partners: moderation by oxytocin and group membership. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284: 20162554
  • Michalis C, Scott-Samuel NE, Gibson DP & Cuthill IC. 2017. Optimal background matching camouflage. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284: 20170709
  • Lindstedt C, Boncoraglio G, Cotter S, Gilbert J & Kilner RM. 2017. Aposematism in the burying beetle? Dual function of anal fluid in parental care and chemical defense. Behavioral Ecology 28: 1414–1422
  • Lopes LE, Chaves AV, deAquino MM, Silveira LF & dosSantos FR. 2017. The striking polyphyly of Suiriri : Convergent evolution and social mimicry in two cryptic Neotropical birds. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research: 1–10
  • Quicke DLJ. 2017. Mimicry, Crypsis, Masquerade and Other Adaptive Resemblances. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell. 576 pp.
  • Raška J, Štys P & Exnerová A. 2017. How variation in prey aposematic signals affects avoidance learning, generalization and memory of a salticid spider. Animal Behaviour 130: 107–117 [blog]
  • Pan AD, Williams KA & Wilson JS. 2017. Are diurnal iguanian lizards the evolutionary drivers of New World female velvet ant (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae) Müllerian mimicry rings? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 120: 436–447.
  • Pekár S, Petráková L, Bulbert MW, Whiting MJ & Herberstein ME. 2017. The golden mimicry complex uses a wide spectrum of defence to deter a community of predators. eLife 6: 1–25
  • Rowland HM, Fulford AJT & Ruxton GD. 2017. Predator learning differences affect the survival of chemically defended prey. Animal Behaviour 124: 65–74
  • Shaak SG & Counterman BA. 2017. High warning colour polymorphism in Heliconius hybrid zone roosts. Ecological Entomology 42: 315–324
  • Shamble PS, Hoy RR, Cohen I & Beatus T. 2017. Walking like an ant: a quantitative and experimental approach to understanding locomotor mimicry in the jumping spider Myrmarachne formicaria. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284: 20170308
  • Timmermans MJTN, Thompson MJ, Collins S & Vogler AP. 2017. Independent evolution of sexual dimorphism and female-limited mimicry in swallowtail butterflies ( Papilio dardanus and Papilio phorcas ). Molecular Ecology 26: 1273–128 [blog]
  • Wang LY, Huang WS, Tang HC, Huang LC & Lin CP. 2017. Too hard to swallow: A secret secondary defence of an aposematic insect. The Journal of experimental biology
  • Wei CH, Lohman DJ, Peggie D & Yen SH. 2017. An illustrated checklist of the genus Elymnias Hübner, 1818 (Nymphalidae, Satyrinae). ZooKeys 676: 47–152
  • White TE, Endler J, White T, Zeil J, Kemp D, Sicsu P, Manica L, Maia R, Macedo R, Kang CK, Moon JY, Lee SI, Jablonski P, Kang C, Stevens M, Moon JY, Lee SI, Jablonski P, White T, Kemp D, Tso IM, Liao CP, Huang RP, Yang EC, White T, Kemp D, Zschokke S, Nakata K, Uetz G, Hartsock S, Kemp D, Holmes C, Congdon B, Edwards W, Hauber M, Muma M, Opell B, Bond J, Warner D, Gawryszewski F, Motta P, Team RC, Stevens M, Merilaita S, Srinivasan M, Poteser M, Kral K, Dickinson M, White T, Dalrymple R, Herberstein M & Kemp D. 2017. Jewelled spiders manipulate colour-lure geometry to deceive prey. Biology Letters 13: S125–S153
  • Wiggering B & Glaubrecht M. 2017. Two potential players in the evolutionary theatre: Do caddisflies mimic gastropods? Acta Zoologica: 1–13
  • Zhang W, Westerman E, Nitzany E, Palmer S & Kronforst MR. 2017. Tracing the origin and evolution of supergene mimicry in butterflies. Nature Communications 8: 1269



 2016

  • Arias M, le Poul Y, Chouteau M, Boisseau R, Rosser N, Théry M, Llaurens V. 2016. Crossing fitness valleys: empirical estimation of a fitness landscape associated with polymorphic mimicry. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283: 20160391. [blog]
  • Bocakova M, Bocak L, Gimmel ML, Motyka M, Vogler AP. 2016. Aposematism and mimicry in soft-bodied beetles of the superfamily Cleroidea (Insecta). Zoologica Scripta 45: 9–21. [blog]
  • Brandley N, Johnson M, Johnsen S. 2016. Aposematic signals in North American black widows are more conspicuous to predators than to prey. Behavioral Ecology 00: arw014. [blog]
  • Charlesworth D. 2016. The status of supergenes in the 21st century: recombination suppression in Batesian mimicry and sex chromosomes and other complex adaptations. Evolutionary Applications 9: 74–90. [blog]
  • Chouteau M, Arias M, Joron M. 2016. Warning signals are under positive frequency-dependent selection in nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 201519216. [blog]
  • Davis Rabosky AR, Cox CL, Rabosky DL, Title PO, Holmes IA, Feldman A & McGuire JA. 2016. Coral snakes predict the evolution of mimicry across New World snakes. Nature Communications 7: 11484
  • Dowdy NJ, Conner WE. 2016. Acoustic Aposematism and Evasive Action in Select Chemically Defended Arctiine (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) Species: Nonchalant or Not? Plos One 11: e0152981. [blog]
  • Komata S, Lin CP, Iijima T, Fujiwara H, Sota T. 2016. Identification of doublesex alleles associated with the female-limited Batesian mimicry polymorphism in Papilio memnon. Scientific Reports 6: 34782. [blog]
  • Pinheiro CEG, Freitas AVL, Campos VC, DeVries PJ, Penz CM. 2016. Both Palatable and Unpalatable Butterflies Use Bright Colors to Signal Difficulty of Capture to Predators. Neotropical Entomology 45: 107–113. [blog]
  • Marchini M, Sommaggio D & Minelli A. 2016. Playing with Black and Yellow: The Evolvability of a Batesian Mimicry. Evolutionary Biology: 1–13.
  • Merilaita S. 2016. Broadening the angle of view on aposematism: a comment on Skelhorn et al. Behavioral Ecology 00: arw067.
  • Mérot C, Y LP, Théry M, Joron M. 2016. Mimicry refinement: Phenotypic variations tracking the local optimum. Journal of Animal Ecology: n/a–n/a. [blog]
  • Mermoz ME, Haupt C, Fernández GJ. 2016. Brown-and-yellow marshbirds reduce their acceptance threshold of mimetic brood parasite eggs in the presence of non-mimetic eggs. Journal of Ethology 34: 65–71. [blog]
  • Moore CD & Hassall C. 2016. A bee or not a bee: an experimental test of acoustic mimicry by hoverflies. Behavioral Ecology 27: 1767–1774
  • Morris RL, Reader T. 2016. Do crab spiders perceive Batesian mimicry in hoverflies? Behavioral Ecology 00: arv233. [blog]
  • Mcelroy MT. 2016. Teasing apart crypsis and aposematism – evidence that disruptive coloration reduces predation on a noxious toad. Biological Journal of the Linneae Society 117: 285–294. [blog]
  • Skelhorn J, Halpin CG, Rowe C. 2016. Learning about aposematic prey. Behavioural Ecology 00: In press. [blog]
  • Skelhorn J, Rowe C. 2016. Cognition and the evolution of camouflage. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283: 20152890. [blog]
  • Skelhorn J, Holmes GG, Hossie TJ, Sherratt TN. 2016. Multicomponent deceptive signals reduce the speed at which predators learn that prey are profitable. Behavioral Ecology 27: 141–147. [blog]
  • Taylor CH, Reader T & Gilbert F. 2016. Why many Batesian mimics are inaccurate: evidence from hoverfly colour patterns. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283
  • Taylor LA., Amin Z, Maier EB, Byrne KJ, Morehouse NI. 2016. Flexible color learning in an invertebrate predator: Habronattus jumping spiders can learn to prefer or avoid red during foraging. Behavioral Ecology 27: 520–529. [blog]
  • Turini A, Veselý P, Fuchs R. 2016. Five species of passerine bird differ in their ability to detect Batesian mimics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 117: 832–841. [blog]
  • Thurman TJ, Seymoure BM. 2016. A bird’s eye view of two mimetic tropical butterflies: coloration matches predator's sensitivity. Journal of Zoology 298: 159–168. [blog]
  • Wallbank RWR, Baxter SW, Pardo-Diaz C, Hanly JJ, Martin SH, Mallet J, Dasmahapatra KK, Salazar C, Joron M, Nadeau N, et al. 2016. Evolutionary Novelty in a Butterfly Wing Pattern through Enhancer Shuffling (NH Barton, Ed.). PLOS Biology 14: e1002353. [blog]

2015
  • Aubier TG, Sherratt TN. 2015. Diversity in Müllerian mimicry: The optimal predator sampling strategy explains both local and regional polymorphism in prey. Evolution 69: 2831–2845. [blog]
  • Barros B, Sakai Y, Pereira PHC, Gasset E, Buchet V, Maamaatuaiahutapu M, Ready JS, Oliveira Y, Giarrizzo T, Vallinoto M. 2015. Comparative Allometric Growth of the Mimetic Ephippid Reef Fishes Chaetodipterus faber and Platax orbicularis. PloS one 10: e0143838. [blog]
  • Boileau N, Cortesi F, Egger B, Muschick M, Indermaur A, Theis A, Büscher HH, Salzburger W. 2015. A complex mode of aggressive mimicry in a scale-eating cichlid fish. Biology letters 11: 20150521. [blog]
  • Bona S De, Valkonen JK, López-Sepulcre A, Mappes J. 2015. Predator mimicry, not conspicuousness, explains the efficacy of butterfly eyespots. Proc. R. Soc. B 282: 20150202. [blog]
  • Croston R, Hauber ME. 2015. Experimental Shifts in Intraclutch Egg Color Variation Do Not Affect Egg Rejection in a Host of a Non-Egg-Mimetic Avian Brood Parasite (G Moreno-Rueda, Ed.). PLOS ONE 10: e0121213. [blog]
  • Crothers LR, Cummings ME. 2015. A multifunctional warning signal behaves as an agonistic status signal in a poison frog. Behavioral Ecology 26: 560–568. [blog]
  • Dugas MB, Halbrook SR, Killius AM, del Sol JF, Richards-Zawacki CL. 2015. Colour and Escape Behaviour in Polymorphic Populations of an Aposematic Poison Frog (W Koenig, Ed.). Ethology 121: 813–822. [blog]
  • Dreher CE, Cummings ME, Pröhl H. 2015. An Analysis of Predator Selection to Affect Aposematic Coloration in a Poison Frog Species. PloS one 10: e0130571. [blog]
  • Exnerová A, Ježová D, Štys P, Doktorovová L, Rojas B, Mappes J. 2015. Different reactions to aposematic prey in 2 geographically distant populations of great tits. Behavioral Ecology 26: 1361–1370. [blog]
  • Feeney WE, Troscianko J, Langmore NE, Spottiswoode CN. 2015. Evidence for aggressive mimicry in an adult brood parasitic bird, and generalized defences in its host. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 282: 20150795. [blog]
  • Hoyal Cuthill JF, Charleston M. 2015. Wing patterning genes and coevolution of Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius butterflies: Support from phylogeography, cophylogeny, and divergence times. Evolution 69: 3082–3096. [blog]
  • Igic B, McLachlan J, Lehtinen I, Magrath RD. 2015. Crying wolf to a predator: deceptive vocal mimicry by a bird protecting young. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282: 20150798. [blog]
  • Kazemi B, Gamberale-Stille G, Leimar O. 2015. Multi-trait mimicry and the relative salience of individual traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282: 20152127. [blog]
  • Kikuchi DW, Sherratt TN. 2015. Costs of Learning and the Evolution of Mimetic Signals. The American Naturalist 186: 321–332. [blog]
  • Kitamura T & Imafuku M. 2015. Behavioural mimicry in flight path of Batesian intraspecific polymorphic butterfly Papilio polytes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282: 20150483.
  • Kozak KM, Wahlberg N, Neild AFE, Dasmahapatra KK, Mallet J, Jiggins CD. 2015. Multilocus species trees show the recent adaptive radiation of the mimetic Heliconius butterflies. Systematic Biology 64: 505–524. [blog]
  • Kraemer AC, Serb JM, Adams DC. 2015. Batesian mimics influence the evolution of conspicuousness in an aposematic salamander. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 28: 1016–1023. [blog]
  • Kraemer AC, Serb JM, Adams DC. 2015. Model toxin level does not directly influence the evolution of mimicry in the salamander Plethodon cinereus. Evolutionary Ecology 29: 511–523. [blog]
  • Kronforst MR, Papa R. 2015. The functional basis of wing patterning in Heliconius butterflies: The molecules behind mimicry. Genetics 200: 1–19. [blog]
  • Llaurens V, Joron M, Billiard S. 2015. Molecular mechanisms of dominance evolution in Müllerian mimicry. Evolution 69: 3097–3108. [blog]
  • Long EC, Edwards KF, Shapiro AM. 2015. A test of fundamental questions in mimicry theory using long-term datasets. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 116: 487–494. [blog]
  • Mallet J. 2015. New genomes clarify mimicry evolution. Nature Genetics 47: 306–307.
  • Mérot C, Frérot B, Leppik E, Joron M. 2015. Beyond magic traits: Multimodal mating cues in Heliconius butterflies. Evolution 69: 2891–2904. [blog]
  • Møller AP, Stokke BG, Samia DSM. 2015. Hawk models, hawk mimics, and antipredator behavior of prey. Behavioral Ecology 26: 1039–1044. [blog]
  • Nishikawa H, Iijima T, Kajitani R, Yamaguchi J, Ando T, Suzuki Y, Sugano S, Fujiyama A, Kosugi S, Hirakawa H, et al. 2015. A genetic mechanism for female-limited Batesian mimicry in Papilio butterfly. Nature Genetics 47: 405–409. [blog]
  • Nelson XJ, Card A. 2015. Locomotory mimicry in ant-like spiders. Behavioral Ecology  00: 1–8. [blog]
  • Pfennig DW, Akcali CK, Kikuchi DW. 2015. Batesian mimicry promotes pre- and postmating isolation in a snake mimicry complex. Evolution 69: 1085–1090. [blog]
  • Sherratt TN, Whissell E, Webster R, Kikuchi DW. 2015. Hierarchical overshadowing of stimuli and its role in mimicry evolution. Animal Behaviour 108: 73–79. [blog]
  • Smith AD, Wilson JS, Cognato AI. 2015. The evolution of Batesian mimicry within the North American Asidini (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Cladistics 31: 441–454. [blog]
  • Su S, Lim M, Kunte K. 2015. Prey from the eyes of predators: Color discriminability of aposematic and mimetic butterflies from an avian visual perspective. Evolution 69: 2985–2994. [blog]
  • Šulc M, Procházka P, Capek M, Honza M. 2015. Birds use eggshell UV reflectance when recognizing non-mimetic parasitic eggs. Behavioral Ecology: arv206.
  • Summers K, Speed MP, Blount JD, Stuckert a. MM. 2015. Are aposematic signals honest? A review. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 28: 1583–1599. [blog]
  • Vestergaard JS, Twomey E, Larsen R, Summers K, Nielsen R. 2015. Number of genes controlling a quantitative trait in a hybrid zone of the aposematic frog Ranitomeya imitator. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 282: 20141950. [blog]
  • Weldon PJ, Burghardt GM. 2015. Evolving détente: the origin of warning signals via concurrent reciprocal selection. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 116: 239–246. [blog]

2014
  • Edmunds M, Reader T. 2014. Evidence for Batesian Mimicry in a Polymorphic Hoverfly. Evolution 68: 827–839. [blog]
  • Pardo-Diaz C, Jiggins CD. 2014. Neighboring genes shaping a single adaptive mimetic trait: Patterning of Heliconius butterfly wings. Evolution & Development 16: 3–12. [blog]
  • Moraes SDS, Duarte M. 2014. Phylogeny of Neotropical Castniinae (Lepidoptera: Cossoidea: Castniidae): testing the hypothesis of the mimics as a monophyletic group and implications for the arrangement of the genera. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 170: 362–399. [blog]
  • Cheney KL, Grutter AS, Bshary R. 2014. Geographical variation in the benefits obtained by a coral reef fish mimic. Animal Behaviour 88: 85–90. [blog]
  • Thompson MJ, Timmermans MJTN. 2014. Characterising the phenotypic diversity of Papilio dardanus wing patterns using an extensive museum collection. PLoS ONE 9: e96815. [blog]
  • Stuckert AMM, Saporito R a, Venegas PJ, Summers K. 2014. Alkaloid defenses of co-mimics in a putative Müllerian mimetic radiation. BMC evolutionary biology 14: 76. [blog]
  • Goodale E, Ratnayake CP, Kotagama SW. 2014. Vocal Mimicry of Alarm-Associated Sounds by a Drongo Elicits Flee and Mobbing Responses from Other Species that Participate in Mixed-Species Bird Flocks. Ethology 120: 266–274.
  • Halpin CG, Skelhorn J, Rowe C. 2014. Increased predation of nutrient-enriched aposematic prey. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 281: 20133255. [blog]
  • Kazemi B, Gamberale-Stille G, Tullberg BS, Leimar O. 2014. Stimulus Salience as an Explanation for Imperfect Mimicry. Current Biology 24: 965–969. [blog]
  • Mallet J. 2014. Speciation: Frog Mimics Prefer Their Own. Current Biology 24: R1094–R1096.
  • Nokelainen O, Valkonen J, Lindstedt C, Mappes J. 2014. Changes in predator community structure shifts the efficacy of two warning signals in Arctiid moths (S Plaistow, Ed.). Journal of Animal Ecology 83: 598–605. [blog]
  • Le Poul Y, Whibley A, Chouteau M, Prunier F, Llaurens V, Joron M. 2014. Evolution of dominance mechanisms at a butterfly mimicry supergene. Nature Communications 5: 5644. [blog]
  • Llaurens V, Joron M, Théry M. 2014. Cryptic differences in colour among Mullerian mimics: how can the visual capacities of predators and prey shape the evolution of wing colours? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 27: 531–540. [blog]
  • Kunte K, Zhang W, Tenger-Trolander a, Palmer DH, Martin A, Reed RD, Mullen SP, Kronforst MR. 2014. Doublesex Is a Mimicry Supergene. Nature 507: 229–232.
  • Kraemer AC, Adams DC. 2014. Predator perception of batesian mimicry and conspicuousness in a salamander. Evolution 68: 1197–1206. [blog]
  • Twomey E, Vestergaard JS, Summers K. 2014. Reproductive isolation related to mimetic divergence in the poison frog Ranitomeya imitator. Nature Communications 5: 4749. [blog]
  • Santos JC, Baquero M, Barrio-Amorós C, Coloma LA, Erdtmann LK, Lima AP, Cannatella DC. 2014. Aposematism increases acoustic diversification and speciation in poison frogs. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 281: 20141761. [blog]
2013
  • Amézquita A, Castro L, Arias M, González M, Esquivel C. 2013. Field but not lab paradigms support generalisation by predators of aposematic polymorphic prey: the Oophaga histrionica complex. Evolutionary Ecology 27: 769–782. [blog]
  • Aronsson M, Gamberale-Stille G. 2013. Evidence of signaling benefits to contrasting internal color boundaries in warning coloration. Behavioral Ecology 24: 349–354. [blog]
  • Ahlgren J, Yang X, Hansson L anders, Bronmark C. 2013. Camouflaged or tanned: plasticity in freshwater snail pigmentation. Biology Letters 9: 20130464–20130464. [blog]
  • Baldwin CC. 2013. The phylogenetic significance of colour patterns in marine teleost larvae. Zoological journal of the Linnean Society 168: 496–563.
  • Brower AVZ. 2013. Introgression of wing pattern alleles and speciation via homoploid hybridization in Heliconius butterflies: a review of evidence from the genome. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 280: 20122302.
  • Brown JL. 2013. The evolution of parental care, aposematism and color diversity in Neotropical poison frogs. Evolutionary Ecology 27: 825–829.
  • Hossie TJ, Sherratt TN, Janzen DH & Hallwachs W. 2013. An eyespot that ‘blinks’: an open and shut case of eye mimicry in Eumorpha caterpillars (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). Journal of Natural History 47: 2915–2926
  • Howse PE. 2013. Lepidopteran wing patterns and the evolution of satyric mimicry. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 109: 203–214. [blog]
  • Hotová Svádová K, Exnerová A, Kopečková M, Štys P. 2013. How do predators learn to recognize a mimetic complex: Experiments with naive great tits and aposematic heteroptera. Ethology 119: 814–830. [blog]
  • Holen OH, Holen ØH. 2013. Disentangling taste and toxicity in aposematic prey. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 280: 20122588. [blog]
  • Hill RI, Gilbert LE, Kronforst MR. 2013. Cryptic genetic and wing pattern diversity in a mimetic Heliconius butterfly. Molecular Ecology 22: 2760–2770. [blog]
  • Igic B, Magrath RD. 2013. Fidelity of vocal mimicry: identification and accuracy of mimicry of heterospecific alarm calls by the brown thornbill. Animal Behaviour 85: 593–603.
  • Llaurens V, Billiard S, Joron M. 2013. The effect of dominance on polymorphism in Müllerian mimicry. Journal of Theoretical Biology 337: 101–110. [blog]
  • Mérot C, Mavárez J, Evin A, Dasmahapatra KK, Mallet J, Lamas G, Joron M. 2013. Genetic differentiation without mimicry shift in a pair of hybridizing Heliconius species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 109: 830–847. [blog]
  • Merilaita S, Schaefer HM, Dimitrova M. 2013. What is camouflage through distractive markings? Behavioral Ecology: 2008–2009. [blog]
  • Møller AP, Vágási CI, Pap PL. 2013. Risk-taking and the evolution of mechanisms for rapid escape from predators. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26: 1143–1150.
  • Rojas B, Endler JA. 2013. Sexual dimorphism and intra-populational colour pattern variation in the aposematic frog Dendrobates tinctorius. Evolutionary Ecology 27: 739–753. [blog]
  • Rowe C, Halpin C. 2013. Why are warning displays multimodal? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 67: 1425–1439. [blog]
  • Rudh A. 2013. Loss of conspicuous coloration has co-evolved with decreased body size in populations of poison dart frogs. Evolutionary Ecology 27: 755–767. [blog]
  • Richards-Zawacki CL, Yeager J, Bart HPS. 2013. No evidence for differential survival or predation between sympatric color morphs of an aposematic poison frog. Evolutionary Ecology 27: 783–795. [blog]
  • Schmied H, Lambertz M, Geissler P. 2013. New case of true mimicry in cockroaches (Blattodea). Entomological Science 16: 119–121. [blog]
  • Stevens M, Marshall KLA, Troscianko J, Finlay S, Burnand D, Chadwick SL. 2013. Revealed by conspicuousness: distractive markings reduce camouflage. Behavioral Ecology 24: 213–222. [blog]
  • Stevens M, Troscianko J, Marshall KLA, Finlay S. 2013. What is camouflage through distractive markings? A reply to Merilaita et al. (2013). Behavioral Ecology 24: e1272–e1273. [blog]
  • Skelhorn J, Ruxton GD. 2013. Size-dependent microhabitat selection by masquerading prey. Behavioral Ecology 24: 89–97. [blog]
  • Smith J, Kronforst MR. 2013. Do Heliconius butterfly species exchange mimicry alleles? Biology letters 9: 20130503. [blog]
  • Supple MA, Hines HM, Dasmahapatra KK, Lewis JJ, Nielsen DM, Lavoie C, Ray DA, Salazar C, McMillan WO, Counterman BA. 2013. Genomic architecture of adaptive color pattern divergence and convergence in Heliconius butterflies. Genome Research 23: 1248–1257.
  • Thomas JA, Elmes GW, Sielezniew M, Stankiewicz-Fiedurek A, Simcox DJ, Settele J, Schönrogge K, Schonrogge K. 2013. Mimetic host shifts in an endangered social parasite of ants. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 280: 20122336.
  • Tatarnic NJ, Cassis G. 2013. Surviving in sympatry: paragenital divergence and sexual mimicry between a pair of traumatically inseminating plant bugs. The American Naturalist 182: 542–551.
  • Willink B, Brenes-Mora E, Bolaños F, Pröhl H. 2013. Not everything is black and white: color and behavioral variation reveal a continuum between cryptic and aposematic strategies in a polymorphic poison frog. Evolution; international journal of organic evolution 67: 2783–94. [blog]
  • Wickler W. 2013. Understanding Mimicry - with Special Reference to Vocal Mimicry. Ethology 119: 259–269.
2012
  • Dasmahapatra KK, Walters JR, Briscoe AD, Davey JW, Whibley A, Nadeau NJ, Zimin A V., Hughes DST, Ferguson LC, Martin SH, et al. 2012. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature: 2–6. [blog]
  • Dudgeon CL, White WT. 2012. First record of potential Batesian mimicry in an elasmobranch: juvenile zebra sharks mimic banded sea snakes? Marine and Freshwater Research 63: 545.  [blog]
  • Penney HD, Hassall C, Skevington JH, Abbott KR, Sherratt TN. 2012. A comparative analysis of the evolution of imperfect mimicry. Nature 483: 461–464. [blog]
  • Higginson AD, De Wert L, Rowland HM, Speed MP, Ruxton GD. 2012. Masquerade is associated with polyphagy and larval overwintering in Lepidoptera. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 106: 90–103. [blog]
  • Newman E, Anderson B, Johnson SD. 2012. Flower colour adaptation in a mimetic orchid. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279: 2309–2313.
  • Gaskett AC. 2012. Floral shape mimicry and variation in sexually deceptive orchids with a shared pollinator. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 106: 469–481.
  • De Wert L, Mahon K, Ruxton GD. 2012. Protection by association: Evidence for aposematic commensalism. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 106: 81–89. [blog]
  • Igic B, Cassey P, Grim T, Greenwood DR, Moskat C, Rutila J, Hauber ME. 2012. A shared chemical basis of avian host-parasite egg colour mimicry. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279: 1068–1076. [blog]
  • Jones RT, Salazar P a., ffrench-Constant RH, Jiggins CD, Joron M. 2012. Evolution of a mimicry supergene from a multilocus architecture. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279: 316–325.
  • Gamberale-Stille G, Balogh AC V, Tullberg BS, Leimar O. 2012. Feature saltation and the evolution of mimicry. Evolution 66: 807–817.
  • Wang Y, Labandeira CC, Shih C, Ding Q, Wang C, Zhao Y, Ren D. 2012. Jurassic mimicry between a hangingfly and a ginkgo from China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 20514–20519. [blog]
  • Kang CK, Moon JY, Lee SI, Jablonski PG. 2012. Camouflage through an active choice of a resting spot and body orientation in moths: Moths actively choose a cryptic resting spot. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25: 1695–1702.
  • Huang SC, Reinhard J. 2012. Color Change from male-mimic to Gynomorphic: a New Aspect of Signaling Sexual Status in Damselflies (Odonata, Zygoptera). Behavioral Ecology 23: 1269–1275.
  • Hoyal Cuthill J, Charleston M, Cuthill JH, Charleston M. 2012. Phylogenetic codivergence supports coevolution of mimetic Heliconius butterflies. (CS Moreau, Ed.). PloS one 7: e36464.
  • Sternalski a., Mougeot F, Bretagnolle V. 2012. Adaptive significance of permanent female mimicry in a bird of prey. Biology Letters 8: 167–170.
  • Pfennig D, Editor G. 2012. Mimicry: ecology, evolution, and development. Current Zoology 58: 604–606.
  • Stoddard MC. 2012. Mimicry and masquerade from the avian visual perspective. Current Zoology 58: 630–648.
  • Wilson JS, Williams K a, Forister ML, von Dohlen CD, Pitts JP. 2012. Repeated evolution in overlapping mimicry rings among North American velvet ants. Nature communications 3: 1272.

2011

  • Huang JN, Cheng RC, Li D, Tso IM. 2011. Salticid predation as one potential driving force of ant mimicry in jumping spiders. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 278: 1356–1364. [blog]
  • Kodandaramaiah U. 2011. The evolutionary significance of butterfly eyespots. Behavioral Ecology 22: 1264–1271.
  • Reed RD, Papa R, Martin A, Hines HM, Kronforst MR, Chen R, Halder G, Nijhout HF, Mcmillan WO. 2011. Optix Drives the Repeated Convergent Evolution of Wing Pattern Mimicry. Science 333: 1137–1141.
  • Ruxton GD, Schaefer HM. 2011. Alternative explanations for apparent mimicry. Journal of Ecology 99: 899–904.
  • Lindstedt C, Eager H, Ihalainen E, Kahilainen A, Stevens M, Mappes J. 2011. Direction and strength of selection by predators for the color of the aposematic wood tiger moth. Behavioral Ecology 22: 580–587.
  • Iserbyt A, Bots J, Van Dongen S, Ting JJ, Van Gossum H, Sherratt TN. 2011. Frequency-dependent variation in mimetic fidelity in an intraspecific mimicry system. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 278: 3116–3122.
  • Crothers L, Gering E, Cummings M. 2011. Aposematic signal variation predicts male-male interactions in a polymorphic poison frog. Evolution 65: 599–605.
  • Merrill RM, Van Schooten B, Scott J a, Jiggins CD. 2011. Pervasive genetic associations between traits causing reproductive isolation in Heliconius butterflies. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 278: 511–518.
  • Alexandrou M a, Oliveira C, Maillard M, McGill R a R, Newton J, Creer S, Taylor MI. 2011. Competition and phylogeny determine community structure in Müllerian co-mimics. Nature 469: 84–88. [blog]
  • Wignall AE, Taylor PW. 2011. Assassin bug uses aggressive mimicry to lure spider prey. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 278: 1427–1433.
  • Laiolo P, Obeso JR, Roggia Y. 2011. Mimicry as a novel pathway linking biodiversity functions and individual behavioural performances. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 278: 1072–1081.
  • Mallet J, Dasmahapatra K. 2011. Evolutionary biology: Catfish mimics. Nature 469: 41–42.
  • Skelhorn J, Ruxton GD. 2011. Context-dependent misclassification of masquerading prey. Evolutionary Ecology 25: 751–761.
  • Ruxton GD, Schaefer HM. 2011. Alternative explanations for apparent mimicry: Alternative explanations for apparent mimicry. Journal of Ecology 99: 899–904.
  • Skelhorn J, Rowland HM, Delf J, Speed MP, Ruxton GD. 2011. Density-dependent predation influences the evolution and behavior of masquerading prey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 6532–6536.
  • Skelhorn J. 2011. Colour biases are a question of conspecifics’ taste. Animal Behaviour 81: 825–829.
  • Chouteau M, Summers K, Morales V, Angers B. 2011. Advergence in Mullerian mimicry: the case of the poison dart frogs of Northern Peru revisited. Biology letters 7: 796–800.
  • Wright JJ. 2011. Conservative coevolution of Mullerian mimicry in a group of rift lake catfish. Evolution 65: 395–407.
  • Stevens M, Ruxton GDD. 2011. Linking the evolution and form of warning coloration in nature. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279: 417–426.
  • Muñoz AG, Baxter SW, Linares M, Jiggins CD, Munoz AG, Baxter SW, Linares M, Jiggins CD. 2011. Deep mitochondrial divergence within a Heliconius butterfly species is not explained by cryptic speciation or endosymbiotic bacteria. Bmc Evolutionary Biology 11: 358.
  • Skelhorn J, Ruxton GD. 2011. Mimicking multiple models: Polyphenetic masqueraders gain additional benefits from crypsis. Behavioral Ecology 22: 60–65.
  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B. 2011. Mimicry: The hunting of the supergene. Current Biology 21: R846–R848.
  • Hines HM, Counterman B a, Papa R, Albuquerque P, Moura D, Cardoso MZ. 2011. Wing patterning gene redefines the mimetic history of Heliconius butterflies. PNAS 108: 19666-19671.
2010
  • Allen JJ, Mäthger LM, Barbosa A, Buresch KC, Sogin E, Schwartz J, Chubb C, Hanlon RT. 2010. Cuttlefish dynamic camouflage: responses to substrate choice and integration of multiple visual cues. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277: 1031–1039.
  • Balogh ACV, Gamberale-Stille G, Tullberg BS, Leimar O. 2010. Feature theory and the two-step hypothesis of Müllerian mimicry evolution. Evolution; international journal of organic evolution 64: 810–22.
  • Bocak L, Yagi T. 2010. Evolution of mimicry patterns in metriorrhynchus (Coleoptera: Lycidae): The history of dispersal and speciation in Southeast Asia. Evolution 64: 39–52.
  • Cheney KL. 2010. Multiple selective pressures apply to a coral reef fish mimic: a case of Batesian-aggressive mimicry. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277: 1849–1855. [blog]
  • Cooper WE, Stankowich T. 2010. Prey or predator? Body size of an approaching animal affects decisions to attack or escape. Behavioral Ecology 21: 1278–1284.
  • Cortesi F, Cheney KL. 2010. Conspicuousness is correlated with toxicity in marine opisthobranchs: Aposematic signals in opisthobranchs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23: 1509–1518.
  • Exnerová A, Svádová KH, Fucíková E, Drent P, Stys P, Exnerova A, Svadova KH, Fucikova E, Drent P, Stys P. 2010. Personality matters: individual variation in reactions of naive bird predators to aposematic prey. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 277: 723–728.
  • Fiedler K. 2010. The coming and going of Batesian mimicry in a Holarctic butterfly clade. BMC biology 8: 122.
  • Hotová Svádová kateřina, Exnerová A, Kopečková M, Štys P. 2010. Predator dependent mimetic complexes: Do passerine birds avoid Central European red-and-black Heteroptera? European Journal of Entomology 107: 349–355.
  • Kikuchi DWW, Pfennig DWW. 2010. Predator Cognition Permits Imperfect Coral Snake Mimicry. The American Naturalist 176: 830–834.
  • Kitamura T, Imafuku M. 2010. Behavioral Batesian mimicry involving intraspecific polymorphism in the butterfly Papilio polytes. Zoological science 27: 217–221.
  • Lee TJ, Marples NM, Speed MP. 2010. Can dietary conservatism explain the primary evolution of aposematism? Animal Behaviour 79: 63–74.
  • Mallet J. 2010. Shift happens! Shifting balance and the evolution of diversity in warning colour and mimicry. Ecological Entomology 35: 90–104.
  • Marples NM, Mappes J. 2010. Can the dietary conservatism of predators compensate for positive frequency dependent selection against rare, conspicuous prey? Evolutionary Ecology 25: 737–749.
  • Matsuura K, Yashiro TA. 2010. Parallel evolution of termite-egg mimicry by sclerotium-forming fungi in distant termite groups. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 100: 531–537.
  • Mendoza-Cuenca L, Mac??as-Ord????ez R. 2010. Female asynchrony may drive disruptive sexual selection on male mating phenotypes in a Heliconius butterfly. Behavioral Ecology 21: 144–152.
  • Molleman F, Whitaker MR, Carey JR. 2010. Rating palatability of butterflies by measuring ant feeding behavior. Entomologische Berichten 70: 52–62.
  • Nijhout HF. 2010. Developmental Perspectives Evolution of Butterfly Mimicry Recent insights into development of color patterns have led to a genetics. Evolution 44: 148–157.
  • Oliver JC, Prudic KL. 2010. Are mimics monophyletic? The necessity of phylogenetic hypothesis tests in character evolution. BMC evolutionary biology 10: 239.
  • Pfennig DW, Mullen SP. 2010. Mimics without models: causes and consequences of allopatry in Batesian mimicry complexes. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 277: 2577–2585.
  • Rowland HM, Hoogesteger T, Ruxton GD, Speed MP, Mappes J. 2010. A tale of 2 signals: Signal mimicry between aposematic species enhances predator avoidance learning. Behavioral Ecology 21: 851–860.
  • Rowland HM, Mappes J, Ruxton GD, Speed MP. 2010. Mimicry between unequally defended prey can be parasitic: Evidence for quasi-Batesian mimicry. Ecology Letters 13: 1494–1502.
  • Rowland HM, Wiley E, Ruxton GD, Mappes J, Speed MP. 2010. When more is less: the fitness consequences of predators attacking more unpalatable prey when more are presented. Biology letters 6: 732–735.
  • Skelhorn J, ROWLAND HMHM, RUXTON GDGD. 2010. The evolution and ecology of masquerade. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 99: 1–8.
  • Skelhorn J, Rowland HM, Speed MP, Ruxton GD. 2010. Masquerade: camouflage without crypsis. Science 327: 51.
  • Speed MP, Ruxton GD, Blount JD, Stephens PA. 2010. Diversification of honest signals in a predator-prey system: Honest signals in a predator-prey system. Ecology Letters 13: 744–753.
  • Speed MP, Ruxton GD. 2010. Imperfect Batesian mimicry and the conspicuousness costs of mimetic resemblance. The American naturalist 176: E1–E14.
  • Stelzer RJ, Raine NE, Schmitt KD, Chittka L. 2010. Effects of aposematic coloration on predation risk in bumblebees? A comparison between differently coloured populations, with consideration of the ultraviolet. Journal of Zoology 282: 75–83.

2009

  • Aronsson M, Gamberale-Stille G. 2009. Importance of internal pattern contrast and contrast against the background in aposematic signals. Behavioral Ecology 20: 1356–1362.
  • Blount JD, Speed MP, Ruxton GD, Stephens PA. 2009. Warning displays may function as honest signals of toxicity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 276: 871–877.
  • Cheney KL, Marshall NJ. 2009. Mimicry in coral reef fish: How accurate is this deception in terms of color and luminance? Behavioral Ecology 20: 459–468.
  • Ferguson LC, Jiggins CD. 2009. Shared and divergent expression domains on mimetic Heliconius wings. Evolution and Development 11: 498–512.
  • Franks DW, Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN. 2009. Warning signals evolve to disengage batesian mimics. Evolution 63: 256–267.
  • Hill ME, Elizabeth M. 2009. The effect of aposematic coloration on the food preference of Aphelocoma coerulescens , the Florida scrub jay. Bios 77: 97–106.
  • Kumazawa F, Asami T, Nakagiri N, Tainaka K ichi, Togashi T, Miyazaki T, Yoshimura J. 2009. Population dynamics of Müllerian mimicry under interspecific competition. Ecological Modelling 220: 424–429.
  • Kunte K. 2009. Female-limited mimetic polymorphism: a review of theories and a critique of sexual selection as balancing selection. Animal Behaviour 78: 1029–1036.
  • Kunte K. 2009. The diversity and evolution of batesian mimicry in papilio swallowtail butterflies. Evolution 63: 2707–2716.
  • Marek PE, Bond JE. 2009. A Mullerian mimicry ring in Appalachian millipedes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 9755–9760.
  • Merrill RM, Jiggins CD. 2009. Müllerian Mimicry: Sharing the Load Reduces the Legwork. Current Biology 19.
  • Savage WK, Mullen SP. 2009. A single origin of Batesian mimicry among hybridizing populations of admiral butterflies (Limenitis arthemis) rejects an evolutionary reversion to the ancestral phenotype. Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society 276: 2557–2565.
  • Schaefer HM, Ruxton GD. 2009. Deception in plants: mimicry or perceptual exploitation? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24: 676–685.
  • Skelhorn J, Rowe C. 2009. Distastefulness as an antipredator defence strategy. Animal Behaviour 78: 761–766.
  • Uehara-Prado M, Freitas AVL. 2009. The effect of rainforest fragmentation on species diversity and mimicry ring composition of ithomiine butterflies. Insect Conservation and Diversity 2: 23–28.
  • Veselý P, Fuchs R. 2009. Newly emerged Batesian mimicry protects only unfamiliar prey. Evolutionary Ecology 23: 919–929.

2004
Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN & Speed MP. 2004. Avoiding Attack: The Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Warning Signals, and Mimicry. 260 pp. Oxford University Press, New York.

2003
Naisbit R, Jiggins C & Mallet J. 2003. Mimicry: developmental genes that contribute to speciation. Evolution & Development, 5: 269-280.

2001




Dumbacher JP & Fleischer RC. 2001. Phylogenetic evidence for colour pattern convergence in toxic pitohuis: Mullerian mimicry in birds? Proceedings of The Royal Society London: Biological sciences, 268: 1971-1976.

2000
Golding YC & Edmunds M. 2000. Behavioural mimicry of honeybees (Apis mellifera) by droneflies (Diptera: Syrphidae: Eristalis spp.). Proceedings of The Royal Society London: Biological sciences, 267: 903-909.
Servedio M. 2000. The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration. Evolution, 54: 751-763.
Speed M, Alderson N, Hardman C & Ruxton G. 2000. Testing Müllerian mimicry: an experiment with wild birds. Proceedings of The Royal Society Of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 267: 725-731.

1925
Poulton EB. 1925. Insect Mimicry and the Darwinian Theory of Natural Selection . The Scientific Monthly, 21(1): 19-25.